Jonah Goldberg calls it “Conservatives-in-the-Mist” journalism, those pieces in which an intrepid mainstream media member does a sort of anthropological study of those odd conservative beasts, and often discover (to their shock, and presumably that of their audience) that those conservatives listen to music, read books, and could even be mistaken for real people.

I get caught by some of this stuff from time to time as well, seeing as I’m in a profession that isn’t noted for a rightward tilt. If I had a nickel for each time people ask me how I can vote Republican and like metal/punk/Zappa/etc., I’d have a whole lot of nickels. My daughter is having to deal with some of this as well. She has inherited a lot of my libertarian ideas, including skepticism of Big Plans — she said this evening that “Every utopia is just a well hidden dystopia.” At the same time, she is obsessed with comic books, science fiction, and loud, fast music, and she’s frustrated by the fact that much of geek culture assumes a default position on the Left, and conversely assumes that to be conservative is to be a knuckle-dragging Puritan. I’ve reminded her of Chesterton’s comment that only live things can swim against the current, but I know it’s hard.

What a lot of this means is that conservatives frequently have to distinguish the dancer from the dance, appreciating the art while knowing they probably wouldn’t get along with the artist. But for those folks on the Left, it may be an unfamiliar, even an uncomfortable position.

Which brings us to something I had meant to talk about before, but had neglected until I saw this piece by Moe Lane at RightNetwork. It turns out that Velvet Underground drummer Mo Tucker has taken part in some Tea Party rallies in Georgia, and this has caused considerable panty-bunching among devotees of the alternahipster ethos exemplified by the Velvets.

I think Lane puts it pretty well:

Those who were born conservative may be forgiven at this point for being confused about the idea that one might have trouble with this–there are artists whom you like as artists, while still objecting to their political views. So? After all, cradle conservatives typically have to come to grips with the concept while still in their teens, given the way Hollywood’s corporate mindset defaults to ‘boutique leftist.’  Speaking as somebody who transitioned to conservatism well after adulthood, I can tell you: it’s a bit of a shock to deal with the idea that suddenly you’re one of the them–those whom your favorites like to rail against.  Of course, I got over it–that’s what adults do–but it was still something I had to get my head around first.  Not that I’m sympathetic to the folks ripped up inside that Moe Tucker isn’t ecstatic at the way that our current ruling party is running/ruining the country. Self-absorption never appealed to me (unless, um, I’m the one engaged in it), and there’s a distinct flavor of rampant narcissism running through the Moe Tucker narrative.  “How could she do this?” is the common sentiment . . . with a silent “. . . to ME?” tacked on at the end.

But I like the answer Lane offers even more. Read his piece to find out.

About profmondo

Dad, husband, mostly free individual, medievalist, writer, and drummer. "Gladly wolde he lerne and gladly teche."
This entry was posted in Culture, Family, Music, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Heroin(e)

  1. Withywindle says:

    Speaking of comic books … I think I was OK reading comix in the early ’80s on my own, but I wouldn’t let my son (when he’s old enough) read comix without supervision nowadays–hypersexualized, left-paranoid politics, etc. What’s your policy re MondoSpawn reading? How much supervision?

  2. profmondo says:

    Well, the Spawn is a third-generation comic reader, so she knows I’m going to read anything she does. Mrs. Mondo and I basically follow the same policy my folks did with me: Read what you want — if you have questions, ask. It’s interesting; she actually tends to ask us if it’s OK to read or watch X, Y, or Z (Family Guy and South Park, for example — both of which received a “not yet.”), and she’s decided on her own that some things (Watchmen, for example) aren’t really appropriate.

    She’s a good kid. (And I know she reads this blog, so… MondoSpawn, anything to add?)

  3. majormaddog says:

    I’ll pull one bit out of Lane’s piece about adults. It seems pretty obvious to me he’s implying that conservatives are adults, as opposed the juveniles on the Left. But maybe not – I guess it’s possible to read that as a line about how awesome he is personally, aside from his political ideology.

    So here’s my question (and i’m not being entirely snarky in asking). I was working at a different part of the base over here with an Army LTC. (that’s not a question but I’m getting there). I was pretty upfront about my political leanings. He seemed interested in politics and engaged in discussions with me. His big thing was that he wanted to see “the adults” in charge. For quite a while, he played the independent moderate type. Then I went back to that office for a week right around the election and it turns out he’s a rabid conservative. I’d suspected he leaned right, but I was surprised at how much when he came out with it. The reference to adults above and the LTC’s use of the term is not the first time I’ve seen that and it’s usually from outright conservatives who are being condescending or conservatives in moderate clothing. Now before you go there, I’m sure there are examples of Dems having used the term during the Bush term. I’m just as sure there are way more examples of conservatives doing this than liberals (mostly because your side is just chock full of white hairs who probably say this every day about the youth of our side). So what’s my question? Eh, I don’t know. Oh, yeah…Obama. Great president or Greatest President? No, really. what’s up with that?

  4. profmondo says:

    Well, I think in Lane’s particular case, the adults aren’t necessarily conservatives so much as “people who don’t get bent out of shape about not being tragically hip.”

    More to your larger point, I think what a lot of conservatives see as the childishness of the Left is the blind optimism and belief in the perfectibility of man. That sort of romanticism typically tends to be something people grow out of after having experienced life a bit.

  5. Pingback: The Boomers Find Our Lack of Faith… Disturbing. | Professor Mondo

  6. Pingback: A Message in a Bottle… | Professor Mondo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s