The Patients of Jobs…

As another Recovery Summer draws to a close, we’re enthralled by the promised presidential pivot to job creation — although we must remember that one who spends too much time pivoting risks disappearing up his own backside. Consequently, it might be interesting to consider what would motivate businesses to hire people.

As it happens, the folks at Chief Executive magazine have explored this very question. The primary motivation for new hiring, unsurprisingly, is having a backlog or other manifestation of too much work for current staffing to handle. But what else might propitiate the folks who decide to hire staff? Phrasing the question differently, what is keeping these folks from hiring people?

That’s where things get interesting. The CEOs surveyed would like to see some evidence that the recession is coming to an end — as would we all. Of course, one sign the recession is ending would be more hiring, but then we get into lagging indicator and feedback loop questions, so we’ll move on. Nearly 72% percent of the respondents said they’d like to see Obamacare repealed — or at least clarified. (Hence my title.) Next on the list was a reduction in regulation, and a little further down was the passage of free trade treaties. Since none of this is expected, two thirds of these potential job creators will either stand pat or actually reduce their workforces. As William Jacobson at Legal Insurrection observes, perhaps the most effective pivot would be a step out of the way.

Of course, this doesn’t mean that these CEOs are calling for the opportunity to behave like Montgomery Burns of The Simpsons or the meatpackers of The Jungle, despite those who seem certain that all businessmen live to watch the employees suffer in exchange for an added farthing gained. But it might be nice to see a bit less of the situation a correspondent of Jonah Goldberg’s describes at his family farm:

To get workers, we go through an official gov’t program to have Mexicans brought to the US.  For this honor, we pay them substantially more than minimum wage and are forced to hire any American citizen at any time who shows up and asks for work.  For our immigrant workers we are required to provide a free house and transportation and a myriad of other gov’t required items that we dutifully obtain at the start of each season.  The documentation is legion, keeping my mother employed full time.  The regs have common sense matters but go  way beyond.  For example, a porto potty in the fields every few acres.  LOL, not the case when I worked the farm.  We had this thing called “the woods.”  Acres of them everywhere.

Recently, the USDA inspectors show up and pull our workers out of the fields for hours of questions (while we still are paying them). They inspect our houses. Several items just not up to code say these inspectors in an accusatory and snide tone.  Threw a stack of regulations literally 8 inches high, small type, saying we are responsible to know and to account for each and every one.

Now we treat our workers very well, but we treat them like men, not children.  The house was “messy.”  My goodness, we need to hire a maid!  The screen door was not exactly square with the frame by an 1/8th of an inch.  Well many folks around here live in older homes that have settled.  The list goes on, but no item was such that our workers thought there was a problem.  The worst part is we were treated like criminals.  We are awaiting our fine for our failing to memorize every federal regulation applicable to us.

My dad is 67 and told the feds that he was out of farming due to this ridiculous bureaucracy and storm trooper treatment.  Their arrogant reply, “[W]ell the law lets us inspect your land and homes one year after you have left farming, so you can’t keep us off your land next year either.”

Is this really the only thing standing between us and Harvest of Shame? I doubt it, but I’m sure it stands between employing people and letting them subsist on the dole.

About profmondo

Dad, husband, mostly free individual, medievalist, writer, and drummer. "Gladly wolde he lerne and gladly teche."
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Patients of Jobs…

  1. The Ancient says:

    Even now, after three years, there’s no one in the administration with a clue as to why so many businesses are reluctant to hire.

    But why hire someone if you don’t know what he’s going to cost you?

    P.S. Gene Sperling would do a perfectly good job manning the xerox machine in a statewide election. Beyond that, he’s out of his depth

  2. Jeff says:

    I returned a few days ago from visiting my family in Louisiana, and it’s interesting to see what’s going on in a state that’s actually creating new private-sector jobs. Since 2006, major film production tax credits mean that more than 300 movies, TV shows, commercials, etc., have been made in Louisiana since ’06. The other day, their Secretary for Economic Development said he has a list of 300 companies he’s actively trying to lure to the state. (While I was there, the big news was that New Orleans snagged a major French video-game developer, thanks in part to a digital-media payroll tax credit.)

    This influx of business has a ripple effect. My sister manages a hotel that didn’t exist a year ago; she’s hiring for jobs that didn’t exist a year ago; those new hires are spending their paychecks at shops that didn’t exist a year ago; and so on. Louisiana has been hit hard in recent years, but it’s amazing what can happen when politicians actually woo businesses rather than badmouth entire industries.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s