QotD: Payment-In-Kind Edition

I’ve mentioned before that my dad was the mayor of our small town in Kentucky for twenty years, and my brother was a police officer for several years. Once, my mom said she was so glad that all of us were doing things to help others. I said, “Well, yeah, that’s nice, but to tell you the truth, I think that I’m doing about the most selfish thing I could imagine. I “do” literature because it gives me so much pleasure, and I want to talk about it with other people because I love it. I think real sacrifice would have been if I did a job that made me miserable but let me buy fancy stuff for people in my life, or let me fund worthy causes.” I do something that I want to do that happens (I hope) to benefit others and make the world a little nicer. But it’s the fact that I want to do it that brings the recompense.

And that brings me to a question I ask myself on occasion. I’ve joked a few times about the idea that as a rightward-leaning libertarian in the humanities, I’m the kind of diversity the academy doesn’t want. But something I consider from time to time is the fact that a lot of very bright people — including most of the folks with whom I’ve worked over the years — are in political camps distinctly opposed to mine. That’s OK with me, but it raises the question: Why do so many academics/intellectuals lean left, and (if I’m a reasonably bright guy) why don’t I? And if I’m going to be intellectually honest, shouldn’t I wonder about my contrary direction?

This is a question Julian Sanchez addresses over at his place, and his answer — although it may involve a bit of chicken-and-eggery — is interesting. The root of the discussion, he suggests, may come from whether one thinks that the world is improved primarily through private action or public/governmental/political action:

If the world is primarily made better through private action, then the most morally praiseworthy course available to a highly intelligent person of moderate material tastes might be to pursue a far less inherently interesting career in business or finance, live a middle-class lifestyle, and devote one’s wealth to various good causes. In this scenario, after all, the intellectual who could make millions for charity as a financier or high-powered attorney, but prefers to take his compensation in the form of leisure time and interesting work, is not obviously morally better than the actual financier or attorney who uses his monetary compensation to purchase material pleasures. [...] If private efforts are ineffectual or relatively unimportant compared with political action, however, the intellectual can rest assured that he’s satisfying his moral obligations by paying taxes and writing persuasively in support of the appropriate political remedies.

But it was in my ellipsis that we find the QotD:

Both are declining to sacrifice personal satisfaction in order to help others—one has just chosen a form of compensation that can’t be taxed and redistributed easily.

And that brings me back to my point — and perhaps my mom’s as well. Because I’m doing the things I want to do, good comes of it. It’s a good that comes through private action, and for which I find myself well enough compensated (most of the time, anyway). It’s just that some of my compensation is spiritual, psychic, invisible.

In turn, that may bring me to my suspicion of government. All government can really do is manipulate the material. And because I know that isn’t all there is, I think the best solutions are those that allow people to choose the individual paths that compensate them (and indeed, that freedom itself is part of that compensation.) So ultimately, I may be an academic for the same reason that I’m a libertarian/conservative: It’s the payment-in-kind that I value.

H/T: Frequent reader and Facebook friend Kathy Phillips Nanney.

About these ads

About profmondo

Dad, husband, mostly free individual, medievalist, writer, and drummer. "Gladly wolde he lerne and gladly teche."
This entry was posted in Education, Faith, Politics, Why I Do What I Do. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to QotD: Payment-In-Kind Edition

  1. Andrew Stevens says:

    All jobs, unless one is engaging in fraud or the government is paying you to sit around and do nothing or something, help other people. If it didn’t help other people, nobody would pay you to do it. Your mother, like a lot of people, was thinking that the only jobs which help people are those jobs which directly interact with the people they help, but this is not so.

    Anyway, on the subject of why intellectuals are on the left, you should read Nozick’s theory, which can be found here.

  2. Andrew Stevens says:

    Hmm. Link didn’t seem to work. Not sure why. Anyway here it is, for copying and pasting into your browser.

    http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/cpr-20n1-1.html

  3. Andrew Stevens says:

    Hah! Didn’t read your link first. Sanchez beat me to it.

  4. Jeff says:

    I’m reading this post of yours during a visit to my New Jersey hometown, which made national news a few years ago when the local and county governments condemned the township’s last farmstead and stole it from a family of unloved eccentrics. As I drive around, I see houses built in clear defiance of local zoning laws, which I know means that someone, either the owner or the builder, knew which palms to grease at the municipal building. Then I see the gigantic highway extension being rammed straight through the center of town, with three homeowners suddenly finding that their tiny, quiet cul-de-sac has become an off ramp.

    The mayor and his local cronies wouldn’t have done more damage to the world if they’d become writers, poets, and litprofs instead.

  5. Bob Agard says:

    Though I wish I were compensated more monetarily, I agree with you about the importance of those invisible compensations. Linked to you here: http://bobagard.blogspot.com/2012/10/payment-in-kind.html

  6. Pingback: Hold Still While We Beat You… | Professor Mondo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s