I’m a week from turning 61 today. The Spawn and I chatted for about an hour this afternoon, as is our Sunday custom, and I’m in the office, listening to the TeenBeat Mayhem feed that runs every weekend. I’m also a month into the new semester, and with it, the new school year. So what’s up?
***
Last weekend, a neighbor with a schedule conflict gave Mrs. M and me two floor tickets to the James Taylor concert in Real City. While I’m not a devotee of Mr. Taylor’s work — it’s a bit mellow for my tastes — I’m certainly not one to pass up a chance to see an artist with his staying power. So it happened that nine days ago, Mrs. M and I found ourselves at Flagship U’s Basketball Barn for the show.
I had actually grown more excited about the show than I had originally anticipated. I had looked around online for updates on Mr. Taylor’s career, and discovered that his touring group was called “The All-Star Band” (as distinct from Ringo’s touring group, “The All-Starr Band.”) When I saw the personnel, I had to acknowledge the truth in labeling. Members included Zappa alumnus Walt Fowler on horn, “Blue” Lou Marini (of Blood, Sweat & Tears, leader of the original Saturday Night Live band and member of the Blues Brothers) on reeds, and of particular interest to me, a percussion team of Luis Conte on Latin percussion and none other than Steve Gadd on drum kit. The rest of the band’s credentials were equally, well, stellar. Unsurprisingly, the group backed Taylor perfectly, never stepping on one another, and always playing what was appropriate to the material.
But of course, Taylor was the object of most of the audience’s attention, and over the two-set performance, he gave them what they wanted. The show was strongly tilted toward his 1970s work, both his own songs and covers he had taken up the charts (such as “You’ve Got a Friend”, “Up On the Roof”, and “Handy Man.”). Between songs, he introduced band members (including his son on backing vocals) and gave the stories behind his songs. While he was known for his semi-lefty politics earlier in his career (Remember the “No Nukes” concert?), his only political comment during the show came when he introduced a song mentioning Richard Nixon, and added that he had never expected to miss Nixon. Not even I could disagree with that. At one point, Mrs. M said “I never knew he was so funny!” Indeed he was, and he came across as a performer who genuinely appreciates the folks who come to see him.
Like all of us, Taylor is aging — he’s 78 years old — but he remains in good voice, not simply “for his age”, but in general. The same can be said of his audience. The crowd was heavily Boomer-skewed, and with the exception of some grandchildren, Mrs. M and I were some of the younger folks in attendance. Part of this may be explained by the ticket prices; our floor seats (18th row) retailed for about $165 each. but one of the results was a very well behaved crowd. Mrs. M noted that no one was standing through most of the show (although he got his share of ovations, especially for “Carolina in My Mind.”)
“That’s because we’re afraid to break a hip,” I said. It was also interesting to leave an arena show without (additional) tinnitus or threshold shift. I suspect I may not be able to say that about the Rush concert this November.
A little rain had begun to fall as we made our way back to the car, but the drive home was easy, and what do you know? Quite a few of the night’s songs reverberated in my head for a few days after. And speaking as someone who has spent time on (much smaller) stages, that may be the best that a musician can wish. He earned that.
***
When I woke up this morning (Ba DAH da dahh DUM), I checked my e-mail and found the morning newsletter from the NYT. The lead story was an interview with Nikole Hannah-Jones (of 1619 Project fame.
The subject of the interview was Ms. Hannah-Jones’s parenting choices — specifically her choices to send her daughter to their neighborhood school — in this case, an elementary school in Brooklyn notable for low academic achievement and for drawing from neighborhoods of low socioeconomic status. Similarly, the child went to a middle school with a history of poor test scores and numerous discipline problems. It’s worth noting that Ms. Hannah-Jones (and her husband, although he’s something of a ghostly figure in the article) had options ranging from private schools to NYC’s school choice programs. They chose to send their child to schools with a low percentage of successful student outcomes.
Of interest, they did this despite the child’s requests, even pleadings, to attend better schools. The rationale for the decision? Per Ms. Hannah Jones:
We thought by sending Najya to a mostly low-income and Black school, we could help improve it for all the children there. From my past reporting, I knew that P.T.A.s at poor schools often can raise only a few thousand dollars, but Faraji and I could write checks that exceeded the annual P.T.A. budget. I witnessed how dismissive school officials could be to lower-income parents who lodged complaints or made demands for resources and how deferential they were to wealthy ones. I believed Faraji and I could bring some of that power with us. We had connections and time and status that should not matter, but that we all know do. And more than that, we believed strongly that if families like ours went into schools like this one, it would challenge other families with similar values to do the same.
Later, she recounts a conversation with her daughter:
I talked about the deep inequality in New York’s schools and how, like those Black families who came before us, we had an obligation to be part of the struggle of our larger community. Even if her schools were not academically the strongest, I explained, her father and I knew that we could provide for her tutoring and any other assistance to make up for what her school may have lacked.
But my child just shook her head, her face a mask of disbelief, and something else: betrayal.
“So you had money to send me to one of the best schools, and you chose not to?” she said, hurling her words. “Because other kids are disadvantaged, you didn’t want to put me in a great school?”
Eventually, Ms. Hannah-Jones allows her daughter to choose her own high school, which is selective, though not one of the city’s most competitive public high schools. Coming to the school after attending a series of schools not known for preparing students adequately for the more competitive environment, the daughter was. . . inadequately prepared.
Algebra, she thought, was the one exception — this was a subject she believed she knew. She had taken it in eighth grade but had to retake it because she hadn’t passed the statewide exam. At the time, I was somewhat concerned, but as Najya had earned A’s in the class I assumed she didn’t pass because, like many children, she has trouble sometimes on standardized tests. When she had to take the course again, I thought that the concepts would be familiar to her. One night early in the semester as we were eating dinner, Najya gushed about how easy the test had been. “I know I got an A, or at least a B,” she said smiling. A few days later, she came into the house, ran to her room without speaking, slammed the door and sunk to her floor, sobbing. She’d failed it.
Later,
That first year, we were in constant contact with Najya’s teachers. We explained to them the type of schools Najya had gone to and that she did not have the same academic preparation as her peers. Her humanities teacher took the lead, working with Najya’s other teachers to get her the academic help she needed. Her biology class was taught by two dynamic and compassionate Black women, who opened their classroom to her if she needed a break and helped her adapt culturally to the school.
Between that and the tutoring, Najya quickly found her emotional and academic footing. By the semester’s end, she was earning nearly all A’s and B’s. And at the end of the school year, she passed her state algebra exam.
Eventually, Hannah-Jones has to confront the idea that she had substantially hindered her daughter’s education in the name of her political agenda. She compares it to the struggles of children like Ruby Bridges, eventually arriving at the conclusion that the system is irrevocably racist, and that actions such as hers, though noble, are taken in vain.
A few thoughts from my end:
- It isn’t an altruistic action if you aren’t the one suffering for it.
- The African-American parents who sent their children to previously white schools were doing it because they wanted their kids to have a better education. They didn’t send them in order for their children to make an unsuccessful school successful, They wanted their children to go to the best available schools — those with better facilities and resources. Invoking the sacrifices of those families doesn’t justify the perversity of Ms. Hannah-Jones’s choice.
- Mrs. Jellyby is not merely a fictional character.
I also took the liberty of passing the story along to the Spawn. Among her replies (capitalization in the original): “OH, WOW! SHE REALLY KNEECAPPED THAT POOR GIRL FOR CLOUT!”
Not much I can add to that, I guess, but credit to her daughter for the strength of will and resilience to catch up, despite her mother’s efforts.
***
In other developments, I have jury duty tomorrow. I’ve been drawn to appear in the past, but they always seemed to ask me to serve while school was in session. I’d send in a copy of my schedule, tell them when I would be available (in the summer), and they’d excuse me. This is no longer the case, apparently — my summons said it was mandatory, and there was no form to request an excuse or postponement, as has been the case in the past.
So I’ve had to cancel my classes for tomorrow, and I’ll be at the local facility tomorrow morning by 9:30. It’s something of an inconvenience, I guess, but I don’t actually mind. It’s in Magistrate Court, which handles traffic violations and misdemeanors in these parts, so it isn’t as though I’ll be sending anyone to Death Row. I’ll do my bit for good citizenship, and I actually hope it turns out to be interesting (assuming I’m empaneled.)
However, it does occur to me that thirteen years and three days ago, I was in another courtroom, with higher stakes.
***
Today’s another anniversary as well. My friend and former bandmate Dennis Cossens should have turned 59 today, and I’m thinking of him as I pick today’s musical selection.
Dennis and I were friends for a lot of reasons — we were both bright guys, and we shared fascinations bordering on obsession with baseball and loud, fast music. One of those points of common ground was the German guitarist Michael Schenker, known for his work with the Scorpions and UFO, in addition to his solo career. In fact, my first national publication was a review of the McAuley-Schenker Group’s Perfect Timing LP, and the two of us (along with the Mad Dog) wound up seeing the band live in Cincinnati. This song, from Schenker’s time in UFO, is one I turned to after getting my heart broken in grad school, and in has some nifty little piano runs that Dee enjoyed playing. It was also the first track on a Schenker “Best-of” collection I bought during that period. So from UFO’s 1976 No Heavy Petting LP, this is “I’m A Loser,” not to be confused with the Beatles number.
See you soon!
















